Date: Fri, 01 Mar 1996 13:19:46 -0800 From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com> Cc: Adam David <adam@veda.is>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: /etc/netstart and NFS /usr Message-ID: <199603012119.NAA24288@precipice.shockwave.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 01 Mar 1996 11:11:16 %2B0100." <2195.825675076@critter.tfs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
routed doesn't need to be moved because rdisc is already in /sbin. However, I had a "interesting" problem last night, and found that having a standalone version of "mt(1)" very very very important (thank god for /stand). If we're moving binaries, I'd suggest moving mt up too. From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com> Subject: Re: /etc/netstart and NFS /usr > Quoting from /etc/netstart: > > # XXX This is known to cause an error if /usr is nfs mounted since it > # will not be available until after the network is up :-(. Once the > # relocation of sysctl to /sbin is done that problem will go away. > > This comment has been there for a long time. Does it mean that sysctl is > destined for /sbin (and overdue for the move), or should it be independentl >>y > copied there on hosts which have /usr mounted by NFS? > > There is a similar problem with routed(8) if it is used. at least sysctl should probably be moved yes. Herr CVS-meister ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, In >>c. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199603012119.NAA24288>