Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 18:51:18 +0200 From: Erik Winge <erik.winge@gmail.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: if_ural in 6.0-BETA1 Message-ID: <4cf221cc050907095139f6058b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2300.193.68.33.1.1126075625.squirrel@193.68.33.1> References: <4cf221cc050718035328cfb071@mail.gmail.com> <05Jul18.130434cest.118130@fd.hif.hu> <4cf221cc05090613208a72a08@mail.gmail.com> <2300.193.68.33.1.1126075625.squirrel@193.68.33.1>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On 9/7/05, =C1d=E1m Szilveszter <adamsz@mailpont.hu> wrote: > Hello, >=20 > > I still have the same problem in 6.0-BETA4. if_ural will disassociate > > if the network connection is idle for more than a couple of minutes. > > This happens every time I leave my computer running without any > > network traffic. I also use WPA-PSK. >=20 > I no longer see this problem on a 7.0-CURRENT box with a kernel+ world > from 26th August. I can leave the box up for a day and idle for hours, th= e > connection stays. I still use the ral(4) cards referenced in the quote. >=20 > Perhaps something missing from 6.0-BETA? As far as I can tell, if_ural.c in RELENG_6 is now up-to-date with 7.0-CURRENT. Perhaps this means the fault lies somewhere else? I guess perhaps i should give 7.0-CURRENT a try. Regards, Erik Winge
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4cf221cc050907095139f6058b>