Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 18:39:43 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> To: Jim Ohlstein <jim@ohlste.in> Cc: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>, =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Waschb=C3=BCsch?= <martin@waschbuesch.de>, ports@freebsd.org, Michelle Sullivan <michelle@sorbs.net> Subject: Re: Committer needed for PR 208029 Message-ID: <0DD478F6916BDE9C42FC4EAA@ogg.in.absolight.net> In-Reply-To: <261A33F8-4884-48B4-9152-4AD9CBC2CE3F@ohlste.in> References: <498CA3F8-15EF-45BD-880C-241F83CBE3DD@waschbuesch.de> <20160405185159.GK35640@home.opsec.eu> <20160405200835.GM35640@home.opsec.eu> <57042958.5010701@sorbs.net> <C96569DA-ADC5-4BE0-819A-7375C3F50D8E@waschbuesch.de> <20160406044431.GO35640@home.opsec.eu> <570517F1.5020305@ohlste.in> <C370FD7BEFFDA8136306B7AD@ogg.in.absolight.net> <261A33F8-4884-48B4-9152-4AD9CBC2CE3F@ohlste.in>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==========DC75819E2EB02402E57C========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline +--On 6 avril 2016 12:00:47 -0400 Jim Ohlstein <jim@ohlste.in> wrote: | Hello, | |> On Apr 6, 2016, at 11:37 AM, Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> wrote: |> |> +--On 6 avril 2016 10:06:41 -0400 Jim Ohlstein <jim@ohlste.in> wrote: |> | Hello, |> | |> | On 4/6/16 12:44 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: |> |> Hi! |> |> |> |>> Actually, I just noticed (when compiling the port), that the Makefile |> |>> now says: |> |>> |> |>> WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes |> |> |> |> Yes, sorry, my fault. Fixed, and as suggested by mat: It is |> |> now as IGNORE with a message explaining how to do it for 9.x. |> |> |> | |> | This is much ado about nothing. The "WITH_OPENSSL_PORT" option is there |> | for just this purpose and is used in many ports. |> |> No, the WITH_OPENSSL_PORT knob is a global one, and must not be used in |> ports makefiles. The fact is, there are ports using it, true, it does |> not mean it is the right thing to do. |> | | Then there are many ports being committed incorrectly, as well as, no | doubt, many *official* packages. | | I really have no dog in this fight. I use it globally and build all of my | own packages with poudriere, but either it shouldn't be there at all, or | it should be ok to use. Having it available as an option to porters and | then saying it shouldn't be used seems a bit silly. Well, it is not available for the porters as it is a global directive, they use it anyway. Anyway, like I said, working on it. -- Mathieu Arnold --==========DC75819E2EB02402E57C========== Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJXBTvPXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzQUI2OTc4OUQyRUQxMjEwNjQ0MEJBNUIz QTQ1MTZGMzUxODNDRTQ4AAoJEDpFFvNRg85IpCMP/1tMz/xYS0VshQPH8xPyaQNp 0++QwfOz08tjpCjes36tpuKeiEdrhUVzYfd58IRv3WgqlyoRNw81rCFRSJw8YXfg sviqoQBGxRgGOB3B7y7oGT9XZxLTb3ezY8RM0cmjuTvMlRe6/BnZ9ydOR1Ajgu0W EA8AS8QJWtLnedGUzvLL0DmZe6ujYjg/9LHfy2JO5QA7BJqCMObpVyFWIRkxD4Pr OKVij7WP2Ox+kJdtNnzodwsc+b/hj/LmKncSxiBuCm3gHQjZrQ5DAbZaCq9Ks0YD et3TSn08wS3ARsV6+h5fkRjPoRXjYfvWJpQkOvKM+jNADQDfxglpF6b5NB8KXqUZ J9DCSm1WMO+5fszvmEXX0GwESN8NiL/PMZzN5owKTNNzvW9YxhvCRY1dVcpZOVeS WriEzXRAesMFhe+TyDysATml3OzbwAvb4qKC9Xx991itTbEORtSJm/oqvXiatj/S 7v2W5ObkWEefzi1BJ3diauMdslJ6vxCjluiDEV/mXuibuBw5QKl0F8i1h+RrnGM3 nnYpUhn6DxSBOI+W3nylAqbjdxqz3lK27udJUs0bp9c/3XUppyg5qGNXE/Cj0MNn JPJab45QgZFG0exlNcPQzf9XL/EyAtpqtg8O3dR+0rGXpYZrvWlefPxxDinpMZoS tWqkL9Iu8y6Id88GHjus =+Z/Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==========DC75819E2EB02402E57C==========--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0DD478F6916BDE9C42FC4EAA>