Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 30 Jan 2013 09:49:31 +0530
From:      Sulabh Kausal <sulabh.kaushal78@gmail.com>
To:        John Hein <gnome-jfbml@snkmail.com>
Cc:        gnome@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Script "configure" failed unexpectedly.
Message-ID:  <CAG%2BSyE4WcNLMe6fj12DTyeh4PGwUqhnkUoySjWkwRLQozUk=qQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <26908-1359492334-209054@sneakemail.com>
References:  <CAG%2BSyE7c%2BbBt=sC3oCTWkfN8e%2BaKycdHe8mC7NZBdAL1RgJ5RA@mail.gmail.com> <24831-1359488878-723419@sneakemail.com> <51082D73.90505@rainbow-runner.nl> <26908-1359492334-209054@sneakemail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks brothers for your immediate response to help me.

It is fixed now, I reinstalled Python but it didn't work. I just copied
pth.h file from /usr/local/include/pth directory to
/usr/local/include/python2.7/ directory and it worked for me.

Thanks,
Sulabh K.

On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 2:15 AM, John Hein <gnome-jfbml@snkmail.com> wrote:

>  > the pth port isn't at fault here. Just rebuild python without the PTH
>  > option selected should fix this.
>
> Well, if his python was built WITH_PTH at one point as it seems, then
> it does seem like a problem with the pth package now being missing or
> corrupted.  Even if he rebuilds python _with_ the PTH option selected it
> should fix the issue, too.
>
> In this case, I guess it's a matter of semantics, but I blame the
> pth port (or the lack of it).  Somehow his existing python port is
> expecting pth and is being brutally disappointed.
>
>


-- 
Regards,
Sulabh K.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAG%2BSyE4WcNLMe6fj12DTyeh4PGwUqhnkUoySjWkwRLQozUk=qQ>