Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 21:46:09 -0500 From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: adding more ram Message-ID: <20031211024608.GA9086@ussenterprise.ufp.org> In-Reply-To: <2946E9F05C8DD511A7DC0002A5608CE4DB2018@gbchm201.exgb01.exch.eds.com> References: <2946E9F05C8DD511A7DC0002A5608CE4DB2018@gbchm201.exgb01.exch.eds.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a message written on Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 02:42:12AM -0000, Sparrevohn, = Thomas wrote: > The /var size should properly stay as recommended. But a sanity > check on the available space when enabling crash dumps might be a > good idea Right, I didn't want to change the default suggestion, just put near that recomendation that crash dumps may greatly increase /var need, and also mention that in the swap sizing section as to why swap =3D=3D ram should probably be a minimum (otherwize you can't turn on crash dumps without repartitioning). --=20 Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/ Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request@tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/19pwNh6mMG5yMTYRApqYAJsHGNfoOuP4nLxhxcfwWyevi1o73QCfb/yT RBSTdXg0oM09cRrFUkFkOic= =n9xm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031211024608.GA9086>