Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 22:13:05 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PUC rewrite Message-ID: <200807260213.m6Q2D22u022503@lava.sentex.ca> In-Reply-To: <2F58935E-6439-45A1-9CB3-894FC577ECF2@mac.com> References: <200806061259.m56CxhdR045603@lava.sentex.ca> <018816ED-8FF3-4834-AD17-59637C87D30D@mac.com> <200807252129.m6PLTwhs021540@lava.sentex.ca> <2F58935E-6439-45A1-9CB3-894FC577ECF2@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 06:26 PM 7/25/2008, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
>On Jul 25, 2008, at 2:30 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>
>...
>>uart0: <Non-standard ns8250 class UART with FIFOs> port
>>0xe500-0xe507 irq 10 at device 14.0 on pci0
>>uart0: [FILTER]
>...
>>uart1: <16550 or compatible> at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0
>>uart1: [FILTER]
>...
>
>There's no uart device found (i.e. probed and attached) at port 0x3f8.
>So, there's no uart that can be associated with the console and you
>won't have a /dev/cuau that is opened for/by init(8).
But if I remove the modem, it does appear and work just fine.
>>How can I force the PCI modem *not* to be uart0 so that the onboard
>>com ports show up?
>
>uart(4) deals with the fact that the console may not be associated
>with uart0, so the real problem is not having a uart driver for the
>serial port at 0x3f8.
>
>>uart0: <16550 or compatible> at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on
>>isa0
>>uart0: [FILTER]
>>uart0: console (9600,n,8,1)
>>uart1: <16550 or compatible> at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0
>>uart1: [FILTER]
>
>Odd.. Is the 3com configured to take over COM1 or something?
Nope, there is nothing that can be configured on it from what I see.
---Mike
>--
>Marcel Moolenaar
>xcllnt@mac.com
>
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200807260213.m6Q2D22u022503>