Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 21:16:40 +0200 From: Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: em network issues Message-ID: <20061019191640.GN71000@droso.net> In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0610191213k659c3b7l59092e8b436e210d@mail.gmail.com> References: <2a41acea0610181046k822afd1qcec4187dc8514187@mail.gmail.com> <b1fa29170610181523t6d240839i887632d6d7576762@mail.gmail.com> <2a41acea0610181531y732cd5sa7bf733cc445491c@mail.gmail.com> <20061018171704.A3851@demos.bsdclusters.com> <4537C126.5000207@FreeBSD.org> <2a41acea0610191140j13d43e12q72fc7697652e222a@mail.gmail.com> <20061019190221.GH71000@droso.net> <2a41acea0610191213k659c3b7l59092e8b436e210d@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 12:13:33PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote: > On 10/19/06, Erwin Lansing <erwin@freebsd.org> wrote: > >On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 11:40:16AM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote: > >> On 10/19/06, Remko Lodder <remko@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> >Kip Macy wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On Wed, 18 Oct 2006, Jack Vogel wrote: > >> >>> I'm a bit confused from the way you worded this, do you have > >watchdogs > >> >>> with em, or you use em to avoid them? > >> >> > >> >> I have watchdogs with the current (post vendor update) em driver, but > >> >> not with an older (pre vendor update) version of it. > >> >> > >> > > >> >Same here! > >> > > >> >Didn't had the problem prior to the update, after the update it > >> >started doing watchdog timeouts, occassionaly the interface goes > >> >up/down after the watchdog error. I did not spot this on my other > >> >servers yet, but the traffic passing the if_em interface is not that > >> >much (just normal webtraffic, mail traffic etc). > >> > > >> >cheers, > >> >remko > >> > >> LOL, you arent helping, i need to know WHAT CVS deltas work vs dont, > >> in other words, which delta in the REL_ENG_6 stream broke things?? > >> If you quantify what 'the update' means that might help me, was this > >> the 6.2 BETA or what? > >> > >A bit more helpfull, but unfortunately not much is a datapoint saying no > >problems April 3rd and watchdog timeouts after September 28 RELENG_6. I > >know, probably too vague to be of any use, but there it is. > > > >Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection Version - 6.1.4 on a workstation > >with next to no traffic. > > so, you mean you did a cvsup on 9/28, and one was done on april 3? Yup, precisely. -erwin -- Erwin Lansing http://droso.org Security is like an onion. (o_ _o) It's made up of several layers \\\_\ /_/// erwin@FreeBSD.org And it makes you cry. <____) (____> erwin@aauug.dk [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFN88Yqy9aWxUlaZARAs7JAKDoa0ZYqBfbFi+tJ4doh07zRvaVWwCeO96K 6At/KxkD3qiYxVmrhhFElA8= =J78o -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061019191640.GN71000>