Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 02:14:47 +0400 From: Yuri Pankov <yuri@darklight.org.ru> To: Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org, Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de> Subject: Re: ich9 ahci support? Message-ID: <20070717221447.GE1152@darklight.org.ru> In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0707171412i64c337d7sce6698f86076a860@mail.gmail.com> References: <469CF9E5.2080200@omnisec.de> <2a41acea0707171412i64c337d7sce6698f86076a860@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--C+ts3FVlLX8+P6JN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 02:12:28PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote: > On 7/17/07, Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> does anybody know if there's a difference in accessing ich8 vs. ich9? >> Is it enough to add ID bits to support it? > > I believe its just an ID kinda change, for my E1000 driver there are a few > other differences, but I assume you are talking chipset. > > If you google 'x86-ich9' you'll find a Linux patch that seems pretty much > device ID changes. I can get more detail if needed but just not right this > moment. > > Jack There's also open PR kern/114473. Yuri --C+ts3FVlLX8+P6JN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBGnT9XeoAklVFrLdgRAucEAJ97IkTjFQCv2kpaoXa6wOYg6fYN5QCgpMHp DpsIOlQ2UBfEWtReaml/caY= =zRF0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --C+ts3FVlLX8+P6JN--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070717221447.GE1152>