Date: Tue, 4 Feb 1997 12:33:16 -0700 (MST) From: Charles Mott <cmott@srv.net> To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@dimaga.com> Cc: Brian Somers <brian@awfulhak.demon.co.uk>, Ari Suutari <ari.suutari@ps.carel.fi>, hackers@freebsd.org, brian@utell.co.uk Subject: Re: Single socket version of natd Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970204115817.9014A-100000@darkstar> In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19970204194456.00bbae30@dimaga.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> My concern is that I should be able to make all users on the LAN (all of > them have access to setting up a PPP connection) remember to enable > aliasing. If I had not wanted it in all cases, I'd just drop putting the > command in the config file. Nothing lost in my case, at least. > > However, a way of giving the user 100% control again might be to add a > -noalias keyword to completely block packet aliasing. This would take one > more bit from mode in IIJ-PPP, though. Besides, as an admin I'm not > certain I would want the users to have that control. > I agree that a -noalias keyword is a not a good idea. The way Eivind is doing things sounds good to me. The "out-of-the-box" software for home users will be simple to set up and have standard defaults that do not typically have to be changed, but there will also be a level of control that an admin wants. Charles Mott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.970204115817.9014A-100000>