Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 11:52:56 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: patches, fixes, regression errors and Olympic dives (was Re: speaking of 3.4... ) Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.19991124115256.01bcc920@staff.sentex.ca> In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19991124021424.00a59c30@nsit-popmail.uchicago.edu > References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.9911231012010.72429-100000@resnet.uoregon.ed u> <2049.943380341@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Posted to NTBugtraq, its title is "What is NT 4.0 SP6a?". To me, the subtitle is, "Why I love, love, love CVSUP and the method used to track STABLE" If it didnt effect us as we have to use NT for some of our customers, its almost laughable... Reading it makes me think of Olympic diving... So, whats the technical difficulty level of a double reverse regression and a SYN fix. http://ntbugtraq.ntadvice.com/sp6a.asp ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Network Administrator, mike@sentex.net Sentex Communications www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.5.32.19991124115256.01bcc920>