Date: Sun, 8 May 2011 21:13:44 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Devin Teske <dteske@vicor.com> Cc: FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E5=85=B0=E6=B8=85?= <while1@163.com> Subject: Re: [UPDATE] New Boot-Loader Menu -- version 1.4 Message-ID: <20110508211344.00006754@unknown> In-Reply-To: <313C949D-643A-422F-98A4-72C9F3AE3181@vicor.com> References: <65D3163B-427B-41F6-80B9-7BA4AF794939@vicor.com> <57a102e1.9eab.12fcda25c3a.Coremail.while1@163.com> <313C949D-643A-422F-98A4-72C9F3AE3181@vicor.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 8 May 2011 10:48:55 -0700 Devin Teske <dteske@vicor.com> wrote:
> I would like to see general consensus from the community for
> separating the items before moving ahead with such a non-trivial
> change.
IMO:
- I agree that there are two different types of actions
- having 2 distinct blocks looks like a good idea to me
(I didn't had a look at the code, if you only have the text
in the variables and the numbers get added automatically,
maybe you can add variables for inbetween items which
are pure text and do not get a number, and they are not
displayed if the variable is empty)
- I do not think that we need two different namespaces here
-> reorder the items, use incrementing numbers no matter
which type it is (ACPI would be number 4 in the example then)
Bye,
Alexander.
--
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7
http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110508211344.00006754>