Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:41:31 -0900
From:      Mel <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc:        Peter Steele <psteele@maxiscale.com>
Subject:   Re: What is correct way to enable watchdog?
Message-ID:  <200902232241.31587.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net>
In-Reply-To: <33296720.221235423494723.JavaMail.HALO$@halo>
References:  <33296720.221235423494723.JavaMail.HALO$@halo>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 23 February 2009 12:11:38 Peter Steele wrote:

> We assumed this would give us a watchdog timeout of 300 seconds (5
> minutes), meaning a system would not reboot unless it is non-responsive for
> five minutes.

No, meaning, if a system is unresponsive for 300 seconds, action will be 
taken. watchdogd will not prevent proper reboots, panics or power failures.

> However, in a recent stress test we had unexplained 
> spontaneous reboots on two systems, with no logs of any kind to indicate
> why the systems rebooted.

Panic, or overheating. Check the dumpdev/dumpdir variables in rc.conf(5).
-- 
Mel

Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules
    and never get to the software part.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200902232241.31587.fbsd.questions>