Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:15:36 +0200 From: Dan Naumov <dan.naumov@gmail.com> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=F3t_Andr=E1s?= <andrej@antiszoc.hu> Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: hardware for home use large storage Message-ID: <cf9b1ee01002151315j3bf249a6n85e27f8f9ee64a39@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <33955.188.157.184.107.1266267470.squirrel@mail.deployis.eu> References: <cf9b1ee01002140653m7b20f60bv12b399d80bd92d9a@mail.gmail.com> <4B786D3A.3000408@langille.org> <cf9b1ee01002141442n283e4f87s50bfd3bf3c69ec60@mail.gmail.com> <4B7980E0.1020907@langille.org> <cf9b1ee01002151239w56ee87b0r67b566aba3103df@mail.gmail.com> <33955.188.157.184.107.1266267470.squirrel@mail.deployis.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> A C2Q CPU makes little sense right now from a performance POV. For the >> price of that C2Q CPU + LGA775 board you can get an i5 750 CPU and a 1156 >> socket motherboard that will run circles around that C2Q. You would lose >> the ECC though, since that requires the more expensive 1366 socket CPUs >> and boards. >> >> - Sincerely, >> Dan Naumov > > Hi, > > Do have test about this? I'm not really impressed with the i5 series. > > Regards, > Andras There: http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3634&p=10 The i5 750, which is a 180 euro CPU, beats Q9650 C2Q, which is a 300 euro CPU. - Sincerely, Dan Naumov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?cf9b1ee01002151315j3bf249a6n85e27f8f9ee64a39>