Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 02:24:21 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: julian@whistle.com (Julian Elischer) Cc: phk@critter.freebsd.dk, nate@mt.sri.com, gibbs@plutotech.com, bde@zeta.org.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf files src/sys/dev/vx if_vx.c if_vxreg.h src/sys/i386/apm apm.c src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC files.i386 Message-ID: <199709230224.TAA00690@usr01.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <34270EA7.1CFBAE39@whistle.com> from "Julian Elischer" at Sep 22, 97 05:34:47 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Anyway, it shouldn't be to hard to make either of the old and the new > > implementations available under a compile option, the new calling > > API is a a superset of the old, isn't it ? > > NO, which is what I'm complaining about.. > I thonk it's a good idea, but since it would ha ve been so simple to > keep a compatible API and extend, it, it seems a foolish thing to do > to NOT do that.. I am now in favor of the new API, now that I believe it can be taken to, effectively, O(1), O(1), O(1) for the most common cases. Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709230224.TAA00690>