Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 09:03:11 +0800 (PHT) From: Arthur Alacar <art@pili.adn.edu.ph> To: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> Cc: Annelise Anderson <andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu>, Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>, Robert Rusk <rrusk@thorung.eeng.dcu.ie>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux vs freeBSD Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.971010090243.9505A-100000@pili.adn.edu.ph> In-Reply-To: <343D4991.446B9B3D@whistle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
how about security issues?.. are they equally _secured_? |art| > > > not really. The NFS code still lags. > > > they re-wrote their networking top work along similar lines toours > > > (except with a more modern approach) it works well. > > > > > I think maybe what I meant was the TCP/IP stuff....which at one > > time was supposed to be better....is the answer to that different? > > > > AA > That's what they rewrote. > basically, because we were embarrasing them.. > that's why 2 systems is an advantage.. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.971010090243.9505A-100000>