Date: Sat, 25 Apr 1998 14:49:59 +0930 (CST) From: Matt Baker <matt@portal.net.au> To: freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: *** Real Action Item: SPECweb Message-ID: <199804250520.OAA01718@portal.net.au> In-Reply-To: <354158BF.A4F1E284@ibm.net> from "Don Wilde" at Apr 24, 98 08:30:07 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On the earlier question of Apache vs. Zeus, I'm still inclined to stick > with Apache. Again my reasoning is that we are out to promote freeware, > and Apache is a known name even to the Wall Street Journal. I'm going to > go back and read some of the earlier SPEC results and see what else is > out there for other single-processor machines, but I'll bet using > ROM/B-DRAM disks will multiply our throughput up to the point where > we're back to net performance as _the_ issue. Has anyone done a comparison test between using Apache by itself, and a Apache server with a Squid frontend? Squid can run in accelarator mode for web servers, and certainly seems quicker than Apache at serving pages. Matt. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199804250520.OAA01718>