Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:57:56 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> Cc: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/samba-devel Makefile ports/net/samba-devel/filespatch-ba Message-ID: <3B24A434.AC014C07@FreeBSD.org> References: <35586.992256011@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sheldon Hearn wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jun 2001 13:35:57 +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > > Yes, but in this case *nothing* is changed in the behaviour of the > > package, because bento knows nothing about WITH_CUPS option, therefore > > packages built after the change will be exactly the same as ones built > > before. > > Oh I see. So if I enable a feature that wasn't enabled before, or > disable one that was, it's okay for me to bump PORTREVISION? Yes, this should be OK. -Maxim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3B24A434.AC014C07>