Date: Sun, 07 Feb 1999 12:23:25 -0800 From: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> To: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@sky.rim.or.jp> Cc: FreeBSD-current <FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.ORG>, nate@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [Call for Review] new ioctl for src/sys/pccard/* Message-ID: <199902072023.MAA07111@dingo.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 08 Feb 1999 00:35:44 %2B0900." <36BDB2D0.CA3FE4BB@sky.rim.or.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > --------------6331448DC47966073EBB6A88 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Jun Kuriyama wrote: > > I'm planning to commit these changes into src/sys/pccard/. This adds > > two features. These features are obtained from PAO. > > Sorry, I forgot to add patch. :-) These basically sound pretty good... > + /* > + * Virtual removal/insertion > + * > + * State of cards: > + * > + * insertion virtual removal > + * (empty) --------> (filled) --------> (inactive) > + * ^ ^ | ^ | | > + * | | | | | | > + * | +---------------+ +-----------------+ | > + * | removal virtual insertion | > + * | | > + * +----------------------------------------+ > + * removal > + * > + * -- hosokawa But this diagram worries me. Does this explicitly disallow physical removal without a preceeding virtual removal? Just to be clear, I have no objections to that approach, but it's something that we would want to make very clear if we're going to make this change. -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199902072023.MAA07111>