Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 2 Jul 1999 11:24:15 +0930
From:      Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
To:        Palle Girgensohn <girgen@partitur.se>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: vinum for root partition?
Message-ID:  <19990702112415.K87392@freebie.lemis.com>
In-Reply-To: <377C1980.3A0B4FDD@partitur.se>; from Palle Girgensohn on Fri, Jul 02, 1999 at 03:44:32AM %2B0200
References:  <377BEE3B.A10C4D8@partitur.se> <19990702105804.I87392@freebie.lemis.com> <377C1980.3A0B4FDD@partitur.se>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday,  2 July 1999 at  3:44:32 +0200, Palle Girgensohn wrote:
> Greg Lehey wrote:
>>
>> [Format recovered--see http://www.lemis.com/email/email-format.html]
>>
>> On Friday,  2 July 1999 at  0:39:55 +0200, Palle Girgensohn wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I'm just setting up a system with two scsi drives, using vinum for
>>> mirroring only. Is it possible to use vinum for the also root partition
>>> somehow? I realize it not simple.
>>
>> Sure, it's just a SMOP.
>
> Sorry, My English isn't native... SMOP? :?)

To quote the New Hackers' Dictionary:

:SMOP: /S-M-O-P/ /n./  [Simple (or Small) Matter of
   Programming] 1. A piece of code, not yet written, whose anticipated
   length is significantly greater than its complexity.  Used to refer
   to a program that could obviously be written, but is not worth the
   trouble.  Also used ironically to imply that a difficult problem
   can be easily solved because a program can be written to do it; the
   irony is that it is very clear that writing such a program will be
   a great deal of work.  "It's easy to enhance a FORTRAN compiler to
   compile COBOL as well; it's just an SMOP."  2. Often used
   ironically by the intended victim when a suggestion for a program
   is made which seems easy to the suggester, but is obviously (to the
   victim) a lot of work.

>>> Here's my disklabel (same for both drives):
>>> #        size   offset    fstype   [fsize bsize bps/cpg]
>>>   a:   144585        0    4.2BSD     1024  8192    16   # (Cyl.    0 - 8)
>>>   b:   803250   144585      swap                        # (Cyl.    9 - 58)
>>>   c: 17928698        0    unused        0     0         # (Cyl.    0 - 1116*)
>>>   e: 16980863   947835    4.2BSD     1024  8192    16   # (Cyl.   59 - 1116*)
>>>
>>> My plan is to sync the the 'a' partitions, so if one disk dies, the
>>> other root partition is useable. But, I guess the system will have to
>>> reboot if the drive crashes, since the root fs will be unusable.
>>
>> If you're using Vinum, you should have only one partition per disk.
>
> Yes, there's no reason to have more than one vinum partition, I realize
> that. You don't mean to say that there's a problem with this setup, I
> hope? :-/ It seems to be working fine, anyway.

It's fine without Vinum.  With Vinum, I'd expect:

#        size   offset    fstype   [fsize bsize bps/cpg]
  a: 17928698        0     vinum        0     0         # (Cyl.    0 - 1116*)
  c: 17928698        0    unused        0     0         # (Cyl.    0 - 1116*)

Greg
--
When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients.
For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html
See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers
finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990702112415.K87392>