Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 13:23:36 -0300 From: lioux@uol.com.br To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: lioux@uol.com.br, "Scot W. Hetzel" <hetzels@westbend.net>, Satoshi Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NOPORTDOCS handling Message-ID: <20000605132336.A780@Fedaykin.here> In-Reply-To: <393B69CF.44614467@FreeBSD.org>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG on Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 11:50:23AM %2B0300 References: <200006021931.MAA67682@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> <200006031234.OAA13213@peedub.muc.de> <20000603144658.A7092@Fedaykin.here> <00a901bfcd8a$e6b0f180$8dfee0d1@westbend.net> <20000604012453.A446@Fedaykin.here> <393B69CF.44614467@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 11:50:23AM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> lioux@uol.com.br wrote:
> >
> > Following that line.
> > Why don't we add:
> >
> > @ldconfig
> > @ldunconfig
> >
> > These would simplify all libraries. Who mentioned cpp?
> > That really sounds marvelous, however, do we desire
> > the extra level of complexity? I do, but do the others?
>
> I rather like to see something like the following in the port's Makefile:
> USE_LDCONFIG=yes
> and optional:
> LDCONFIG_DIRS=/foo/lib /bar/lib (defaulting to ${PREFIX}/lib of course).
>
> which would add all necessary magic to the PLIST.
This one has my vote.
Regards,
Mario Ferreira
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000605132336.A780>