Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 12:57:40 -0500 From: "Jacques A . Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> To: Norbert Irmer <norbert.irmer@heim9.tu-clausthal.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problems building ports/x11-toolkits/wxGTK Message-ID: <20000623125740.O76049@bone.nectar.com> In-Reply-To: <39539C93.1B9E604A@heim9.tu-clausthal.de>; from norbert.irmer@heim9.tu-clausthal.de on Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 07:21:23PM %2B0200 References: <39536EFF.215A7623@heim9.tu-clausthal.de> <20000623094031.G76049@bone.nectar.com> <39539C93.1B9E604A@heim9.tu-clausthal.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 23, 2000 at 07:21:23PM +0200, Norbert Irmer wrote: > I thought that the question if there shall exist a link > > /usr/include/X11 -> /usr/X11R6/include/X11 > > or not, is also of interest to ~current. It might have been, but we've established that there needn't be such a link. > and autoconf only searches in the standard include paths and > the ones given by CCFLAGS, so this isn't a bug in the configure > script. No, it is a bug. Note that using --x-includes et. al. doesn't work either. The configure script should set CPPFLAGS correctly. > CCFLAGS="-I/usr/X11R6/include" _must_ be set from within the ports > file, I disagree, although this is an acceptable workaround for the bug. > It is used in "src/gtk/utilsgtk.cpp": I missed that. > A commented line within the Makefile would be sufficient for my part, like: That's not acceptable for packaging. -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000623125740.O76049>