Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 02:30:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@info.iet.unipi.it> To: Greg Skafte <skafte@worldgate.ca> Cc: freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipfw accounting problem? .... Message-ID: <200007150030.CAA22244@info.iet.unipi.it> In-Reply-To: <396FAF0E.9B6EF521@worldgate.ca> from Greg Skafte at "Jul 14, 2000 06:23:42 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I really haven't started looking into the code .... but > should the checkstate rule show packet accounting matches..... the way it is implemented is to account packets into the dynamic rules and probably also in the "parent" rule (the one with "keep-state". cheers luigi > 09000 0 0 check-state > 09500 16194 1609751 allow tcp from x.x.x.x to any keep-state out xmit > fxp0 setup > > > yet there are packet matches in the dynamic rules ..... > > > > -- > Email: skafte@worldgate.ca Voice: +780 413 1910 Fax: +780 421 4929 > #575 Sun Life Place * 10123 99 Street * Edmonton, AB * Canada * T5J 3H1 > -- -- > When things can't get any worse, they simplify themselves by getting a > whole lot worse then complicated. A complete and utter disaster is the > simplest thing in the world; it's preventing one that's complex. > (Janet Morris) Content-Description: Card for Greg Skafte [Attachment, skipping...] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200007150030.CAA22244>