Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 18:04:10 -0800 (PST) From: opentrax@email.com To: wes@softweyr.com Cc: advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: accessing portal site Message-ID: <200011140204.SAA06326@spammie.svbug.com> In-Reply-To: <3A100901.B4D7811@softweyr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 13 Nov, Wes Peters wrote: > opentrax@email.com wrote: >> >> On 13 Nov, Greg Lehey wrote: >> > On Sunday, 12 November 2000 at 20:18:57 -0500, Lanny Baron wrote: >> > >> >> In no way did I make any representation or link between myself and The >> >> FreeBSD Project or any of its communities. >> > >> > By copying -advocacy, you implied exactly that. Please don't do it >> > again. You're more than welcome to behave in whatever manner you see >> > fit, but have the courtesy to not raise the impression that >> > FreeBSD-advocacy is behind you. >> >> As I see this posting, this person is informing us of some >> rather important information, which we might want to take note of. >> The topic, while NOT belonging to 'advocacy', is of importance >> to those who advocacte *BSD. Personally I can recount many >> such stories, but this is not about me. > > That's what BCC: was invented for. Greg is exactly right in that publicly > copying an address @freebsd.org implies some sort of complicity or agree- > ment on the part of the FreeBSD project. I certainly did not agree with > the tone of Lanny's original message. > I think we agree that Lanny's message does not belong in 'advocacy'. We must ask then, How important is his information? Does it add to the longivity of *BSD? Can we benifit from his information? If we can benifit from his information, what should be done with it? Can I say we agree that his message does not belong in 'advocacy'? Jessem. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200011140204.SAA06326>