Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2000 18:28:11 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Stale /usr/ports tree on freefall (was: Re: FreeBSD Port: xfce-3.5.2) Message-ID: <20001210182811.B1015@ringworld.oblivion.bg> In-Reply-To: <3A33AD74.74E2E284@wiegand.org>; from chip@wiegand.org on Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 08:21:08AM -0800 References: <3A32FBEE.F6E3CE68@wiegand.org> <20001210171402.A1015@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <3A33AD74.74E2E284@wiegand.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes, this is true - I sent an email to Satoshi Asami, maybe I should ask the whole -ports list - whom do people bug to update freefall.freebsd.org's /usr/ports tree? :) Including /usr/ports/INDEX, which is currently kind of stale - generated just after the 'new world order' ports changeover to pkg-plist and files/patch-* :( Thus, the cgi/ports.cgi script, which queries /usr/ports/INDEX, reports really outdated info :( G'luck, Peter -- The rest of this sentence is written in Thailand, on On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 08:21:08AM -0800, chip wrote: > Peter Pentchev wrote: > > > > On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 07:43:42PM -0800, chip wrote: > > > Just out of curiosity - when will this port be updated? > > > XFCE is now up to 3.6.2, at least, with many enhancements. > > > > > > Thankyou, > > > > [root@ringworld:v0 /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce]# make -V PORTVERSION > > 3.6.3 > > [root@ringworld:v0 /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce]# make -V PKGNAME > > xfce-3.6.3 > > [root@ringworld:v0 /usr/ports/x11-wm/xfce]# > > > > Looks even better than 3.6.2 to me ;) > > Thankyou, I was just looking at the description on the fbsd web > site, > it shows 3.5.2 still. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001210182811.B1015>