Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 22:36:51 -0600 From: Bob Willcox <bob@immure.com> To: tsikora@powerusersbbs.com Cc: "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG" <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Athlon Thunderbird 700 w. Asus K7M Motherboard vs. FreeBSD 4.2 Message-ID: <20010124223651.A5269@luke.immure.com> In-Reply-To: <3A6EE108.25026852@home.com>; from tsikora@home.com on Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 09:04:56AM -0500 References: <3A5F1F43.EE70CB3C@inode.at> <20010112161044.A97484@walton.maths.tcd.ie> <009e01c07cb7$132d9e30$3028680a@tgt.com> <3A5F3951.9932EED5@mindmaker.com> <00d101c07cbe$4f1f84b0$3028680a@tgt.com> <3A5F95AF.F8B120D4@mindmaker.com> <20010124141126.A97916@luke.immure.com> <031e01c08643$0134c420$3028680a@tgt.com> <3A6EE108.25026852@home.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 09:04:56AM -0500, Ted Sikora wrote: > > Count it as a blessing the Slot A classic's are more robust under > load... 512 cache is still more than 256 no matter what the speed. > Usually worth 10% look at the Celeron vs Pentium II. I don't care what > the benchmarks say in the real world there is a difference. For the workload that I often run (FreeBSD "make world" :-) I seem to remember about a 10% improvment when I switched one of my systems from a 512KB half-speed cache (orig Athlon) to a 256KB full-speed cache Thunderbird where the processor speed was the same. I certainly wouldn't argue that a different job mix could produce a different or even the opposite result, it's just that it appears that "make world" isn't one of them. Note that this was all that the system was doing at the time. Bob -- Bob Willcox The reason we come up with new versions is not to bob@vieo.com fix bugs. It's absolutely not. Austin, TX -- Bill Gates To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010124223651.A5269>