Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:41:59 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-toolkits/wxgtk distinfo Message-ID: <20010129094159.A3063@hamlet.nectar.com> In-Reply-To: <3A758E90.4B7685D@FreeBSD.org>; from sobomax@FreeBSD.org on Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 05:38:57PM %2B0200 References: <200101291530.f0TFUQO76641@freefall.freebsd.org> <3A758E90.4B7685D@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 05:38:57PM +0200, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Jacques Vidrine wrote: > > > nectar 2001/01/29 07:30:26 PST > > > > Modified files: > > x11-toolkits/wxgtk distinfo > > Log: > > Chase checksum ... the distfile was re-rolled without changing > > the version number. The alarmingly extensive changes were: > > = use old-style HTML help by default > > = 8-bit HTML entities specified differently in source > > (e.g. "\344" instead of "d") > > = change in the way dynamic modules are loaded (RTLD_NOW -> RTLD_LAZY) > > = bugfixes (?) for image scaling > > = updated mimetypes support: new flags `needsterminal' and `copiusoutput' > > = comment changes/additions > > PORTREVISION bump, please. I purposely did not bump PORTREVISION. Functionality was not actually changed in any significant way, even though there were lots of source changes. I'd be happy to bump it if it were otherwise. Unnecessary PORTREVISION bumps are quite annoying. -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010129094159.A3063>