Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 18:25:11 +0100 From: Pedro Timoteo <deh@meganet.pt> To: advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: top uptime! Message-ID: <0104201825111T.20864@dehumanizer.meganet.pt> In-Reply-To: <3AE07137.5B2EB5CB@acuson.com> References: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10104201901010.24366-100000@servww6.ww.uni-erlangen.de> <3AE07137.5B2EB5CB@acuson.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> It's very interesting to note which OS is *not* listed. I don't want to be TOO annoying, but could it be because the linux kernel 2.4 is about 4 months old, and since then most people have upgraded to it, ruining their uptimes? I'm not saying that Linux is more stable (I know it isn't, I use both), but in this case I don't think the stability of Linux is fairly shown here. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?0104201825111T.20864>