Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 08:23:10 +0300 From: Valentin Nechayev <netch@iv.nn.kiev.ua> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: wint_t Message-ID: <20010516082310.A921@iv.nn.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <3B010778.287FAF5E@mindspring.com>; from tlambert2@mindspring.com on Tue, May 15, 2001 at 03:39:52AM -0700 References: <20010514164401.A61243@dragon.nuxi.com> <20010515023221.A41666@student.uu.se> <20010514174502.J2009@fw.wintelcom.net> <20010515093610.A1835@iv.nn.kiev.ua> <3B010778.287FAF5E@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tue, May 15, 2001 at 03:39:52, tlambert2 (Terry Lambert) wrote about "Re: wint_t": [...skip...] > I maintain that the correct size for wchar_t is 16 bits, > until someone can point to a character set that needs > more than that, and which has been ratified by a standards > body. I'm fully agreed now with your arguments against 32bits wchar_t and for 16bits wchar_t. But it is _already_ at least 32 bits, though it is only for working with normal integer types. And two different declarations (both in standard system headers) are conflicting: netch@iv:~/tmp>gcc -c -Wall fff.c In file included from fff.c:5: /usr/include/ncurses.h:236: conflicting types for `wchar_t' /usr/include/stddef.h:58: previous declaration of `wchar_t' netch@iv:~/tmp>cat fff.c #define _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED #include <sys/types.h> #include <stddef.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <ncurses.h> netch@iv:~/tmp> Or say me that this compilation mode is incorrect by definition...;| /netch To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010516082310.A921>