Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 21:36:30 +0300 (MSK) From: "."@babolo.ru To: bfoz@glue.umd.edu (Brandon Fosdick) Cc: clefevre@citeweb.net, marcel@xcllnt.net, obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, andreas@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PORTVERSION=6.1 wrong in linux_base-62 ??? Message-ID: <200111161836.VAA22831@aaz.links.ru> In-Reply-To: <3BF55402.2D05875@glue.umd.edu> from "Brandon Fosdick" at "Nov 16, 1 12:59:30 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brandon Fosdick writes:
> Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
> >
> > Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 09:03:11AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > > For linux_base, I don't see that need. The 7.1 version
> > > > should include any needed 6.2 "compat" libs(bits).
> > >
> > > No. The linux_base-7 port should install a minimal set of Red Hat 7.x
> > > packages. If Red Hat 7.x sucks, linux_base-7 will sucks. It's that
> > > simple...
> >
> > I guess David was thinking to something like linux_compat-7 which
> > install cleanly over linux_base-7 as linux_devtools and such do.
> >
> > so, linux ports which require 7.1 are safe w/ linux_base-7 and
> > the ones which require 6.x are safe w/ linux_compat-7. no more
> > need to install linux_base-7 over linux_base or whatever...
>
> Sorry for jumping in mid-thread...
>
> Is there someway to have /compat/linux6 and /compat/linux7? i.e. run the two
> different versions in their own seperate linuxulators.
And non-standart brandelf'ing...
... or ln -s linux{6|7} linux before execute some linux binary
FreeBSD with single user Linux :-)
--
@BABOLO http://links.ru/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200111161836.VAA22831>