Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 00:44:41 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: Steven Huwig <sjh13@po.cwru.edu> Cc: doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: tact Message-ID: <20020418214441.GD3398@hades.hell.gr> In-Reply-To: <3CBF1EA2.3010101@po.cwru.edu> References: <001901c1e702$17333fb0$3200a8c0@internal.lan> <20020418175925.GA5384@submonkey.net> <20020418111530.B25502@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> <3CBF1EA2.3010101@po.cwru.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On 2002-04-18 15:29, Steven Huwig wrote: >Brooks Davis wrote: >>On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 06:59:25PM +0100, Ceri Davies wrote: >>>It's not referring to the same incident. >>>That part of the document predates September 11th, 2001. >>> >>>We've discussed this here before, and the general consensus (which I >>>personally agree with) was that it remains a good example, even after >>>the event you're concerned with (perhaps even more so). >> >>I would suggest that this be footnoted. > > Even better, perhaps the example can be made more explicit: "A number of > firms learned this the hard way after the 1993 explosion at the World > Trade Center." I like this! Being explicit won't hurt a bit. I don't really care about being ``politically correct'', but since this very same question is going to be thought, asked, replied and hashed to death periodically, it is a very good idea to be as specific as possible. Giorgos. --EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE8vz5I1g+UGjGGA7YRAjUzAKCJhLjxoWz4KlHIinLtLClsgYhIUACfU5vC 4c7CJMaaoshTvVLvvmrYoxU= =Kc33 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020418214441.GD3398>