Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 16:31:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Gordon Tetlow <gordon@FreeBSD.org> To: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, <arch@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: MFC of src/etc/rc.subr Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206201631040.28471-100000@smtp.gnf.org> In-Reply-To: <3D1197E0.26BCCA08@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Doug Barton wrote: > Terry Lambert wrote: > > > > Doug Barton wrote: > > > On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > > > > I'm going to MFC src/etc/rc.subr into -STABLE probably tomorrow unless > > > > someone has some grevious reason that it shouldn't. > > > > > > Personally I think it's way too premature to consider this, before we > > > actually have things working in -current. > > > > Since it won't be turned on by default, this should be a > > non-problem. Even if it were turned on, it should *still* > > not be a problem, until people provide ports rc scripts in > > the new format. > > > > I think things *are* working in -current. > > My concern is that people will start writing scripts that use these > interfaces, then we're going to change them. However, if no one else > objects, I suppose it's ok.... Actually, I think this is a good reason. I'm going to think on it some more. I have some ideas I need to flesh out and probably talk with lukem about. -gordon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.44.0206201631040.28471-100000>