Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 12:18:40 +0100 From: "Simon 'corecode' Schubert" <corecode@corecode.ath.cx> To: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@portaone.com> Cc: sobomax@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, portmgr@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USE_GETOPT patch available Message-ID: <20030206121840.1a0cafd3.corecode@corecode.ath.cx> In-Reply-To: <3E413726.7AF3B256@portaone.com> References: <20030205011921.24c642cb.corecode@corecode.ath.cx> <20030205010005.GA35933@vega.vega.com> <20030205024524.2edc919c.corecode@corecode.ath.cx> <3E413726.7AF3B256@portaone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=.j1KOIqZKT:/wRg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lately Maxim Sobolev told:
> USE_GNUGETOPT=yes
> CONFIGURE_ENV=CPPFLAGS="${GNUGETOPT_CFLAGS} -ISOME -DOTHER -FLAGS"
> LIBS="${GNUGETOPT_LIBS}"
>
> The reason why I think that automatic addition into CONFIGURE_ENV is
> Bad Thing[tm] is because user might have other options in
> CPPFLAGS/LIBS, in that case your patch will wanish them.
actually not; the patch was written with the thought that CFLAGS/LDFLAGS
should not be destroyed if already set by the port. the getopt flags
will be appended
cheers
simon
--
/"\ http://corecode.ath.cx/#donate
\ /
\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
/ \ Against HTML Mail and News
--=.j1KOIqZKT:/wRg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE+QkSUr5S+dk6z85oRAuoaAKCC0LRqF3g/mTG/2JLi8Z8tU5wv1ACgz1tX
irmO9C/XxZ6sW5MeQ2rF/wU=
=PAZj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=.j1KOIqZKT:/wRg--
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030206121840.1a0cafd3.corecode>