Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 10:15:43 -0700 From: Johnson David <DavidJohnson@Siemens.com> To: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org>, advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs. Linux vs. Windows Message-ID: <200306231015.44135.DavidJohnson@Siemens.com> In-Reply-To: <3EF4567A.23525.2ACFD52E@localhost> References: <002201c33812$5b881e80$c601a8c0@starfly> <3EF4567A.23525.2ACFD52E@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 21 June 2003 09:58 am, Dan Langille wrote: > It should also be comparing Windows XP, not Windows 2000. I don't > think we'd like it if they looking at FreeBSD 4.2... Win2K is still very widely used in the market segments where FreeBSD might be considered. Most of the points against Win2K also apply to WinXP, so maybe relabeling the column "Windows 2000/XP" is more appropriate. David
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200306231015.44135.DavidJohnson>