Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 1 Dec 2003 01:47:22 +0100 (CET)
From:      Martin Blapp <mb@imp.ch>
To:        Andy <andy@richardflanagan.com.au>
Cc:        Harald Schmalzbauer <h@schmalzbauer.de>
Subject:   Re: Performance difference native/linux OOo1.1
Message-ID:  <20031201014537.N16675@cvs.imp.ch>
In-Reply-To: <3FCA74CE.9020506@richardflanagan.com.au>
References:  <200311261438.03768@harrymail> <20031130.175915.783372313.chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp> <3FCA74CE.9020506@richardflanagan.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Hi,

> I am wondering why there is such a big performance difference between the
> linux and the native OpenOffice version on FreeBSD 5.2-beta (i386).
> For example starting the native OO takes about 30 seconds, where the
> Linux version takes about 5 seconds.

I suspect that our loader/shared library support is more expensive than the
linux one. I'll try to debug the speed problems this week.

Martin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031201014537.N16675>