Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 11:44:00 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: Peter Grehan <grehan@freebsd.org>, rwatson@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HFS+ on FreeBSD (was Re: 5.1-RELEASE-p11 - ACPI panic during shutdown, USB panic w/ USB2 HD) Message-ID: <XFMail.20031210114400.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <3FD69069.5080505@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10-Dec-2003 Peter Grehan wrote: >> Shouldn't the HFS+ support get committed? It seems it would be very >> useful to FreeBDS/PowerPC users. > > Does anyone know if APSL-licensed code can go into the tree ? > Or does it go into a side dir ala sys/gnu ? Core just had a discussion on this. rwatson@ is the person to ask for sure, but I believe the result is to treat APSL code like GNU code, meaning likely, yes, it will need a sys/apsl/ tree that it lives under or some such. I would talk to rwatson@ to make sure. -- John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20031210114400.jhb>