Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 22:37:08 +0300 (MSK) From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: the TCP MSS resource exhaustion commit Message-ID: <20040109223638.R53481@news1.macomnet.ru> In-Reply-To: <3FFF027C.A6900160@freebsd.org> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1040109113607.63053B-100000@fledge.watson.org> <20040109215449.J19580@news1.macomnet.ru> <3FFF027C.A6900160@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, 20:35+0100, Andre Oppermann wrote: > Maxim Konovalov wrote: > > > > On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, 11:39-0500, Robert Watson wrote: > > [...] > > > I guess my basic worry in this conversation is that fundamentally, the > > > rate detection and "stop" approach is based on a common case heuristic: > > > "Most well behaved applications don't...". Unfortunately, I have the > > > feeling we're going to run into a lot of exceptions, and while we can > > > improve the heuristic, I can't help but wonder if we shouldn't disable the > > > heuristic by default, and provide better reporting so that sites can tell > > > > Seconded. It will be a major PITA if we ship 5.2-R with "broken" > > TCP/IP. > > I committed it with default to off for 5.2-R (the disconnect part). Great, thanks! -- Maxim Konovalov, maxim@macomnet.ru, maxim@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040109223638.R53481>