Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 24 Jan 2009 23:30:50 +0300
From:      Alex Keda <admin@lissyara.su>
To:        "Paul B. Mahol" <onemda@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: acpi_throttle1: failed to attach P_CNT
Message-ID:  <497B7A7A.3080103@lissyara.su>
In-Reply-To: <3a142e750901240847o652c581erd1fe90c776824fbe@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <497A159B.5050404@lissyara.su> <497B24D5.3010200@lissyara.su> <3a142e750901240847o652c581erd1fe90c776824fbe@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Paul B. Mahol пишет:
> On 1/24/09, Alex Keda <admin@lissyara.su> wrote:
>> Alex Keda pishet:
>>> After last update I have in dmesg
>>>
>>> acpi_throttle1: <ACPI CPU Throttling> on cpu1
>>> acpi_throttle1: failed to attach P_CNT
>>> device_attach: acpi_throttle1 attach returned 6
>>>
>>> When I build somesing - laptop shutdown, because CPU temp > 105 Celsius
>>>
>>> HP# uname -a
>>> FreeBSD HP.lissyara.su 8.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #0: Thu Jan 22
>>> 19:49:57 MSK 2009     root@HP.lissyara.su:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HP  amd64
>>> HP#
>> HP$ dmesg
> ....
> 
> I get this one:
> 
> GEOM: ad0s1: geometry does not match label (15h,63s != 16h,63s).
> Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
> ACPI Exception (utmutex-0376): AE_TIME, Thread 186B0 could not acquire
> Mutex [0] [20070320]
> ACPI Error (exutils-0180): Could not acquire AML Interpreter mutex [20070320]
> ACPI Error (utmutex-0421): Mutex [0] is not acquired, cannot release [20070320]
> ACPI Error (exutils-0250): Could not release AML Interpreter mutex [20070320]
> ACPI Exception (utmutex-0376): AE_TIME, Thread 186B0 could not acquire
> Mutex [0] [20070320]
> ACPI Error (exutils-0180): Could not acquire AML Interpreter mutex [20070320]
> ACPI Error (utmutex-0421): Mutex [0] is not acquired, cannot release [20070320]
> ACPI Error (exutils-0250): Could not release AML Interpreter mutex [20070320]
> 
> The problem is it doesnt happens always, but with soft reset there is
> (perceived)
> bigger chance to happen. Also kernel without WITNESS and other debug
> options have much bigger
> chance for this error to happen.

nooptions         KDB
nooptions         DDB
nooptions         GDB
nooptions         INVARIANTS
nooptions         INVARIANT_SUPPORT
nooptions         WITNESS
nooptions         WITNESS_SKIPSPIN


no changes =(
any idea?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?497B7A7A.3080103>