Date: Sat, 02 May 2009 09:43:49 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gustau_P=E9rez?= <gperez@entel.upc.edu> To: "Paul B. Mahol" <onemda@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Signal sensitivity problem with if_rum Message-ID: <49FBF9B5.40800@entel.upc.edu> In-Reply-To: <3a142e750905011716g39ea55f0kd081bfdd55709b37@mail.gmail.com> References: <49FA2E3F.9050108@entel.upc.edu> <3a142e750905010655i5e56282eu240e13f2a03dfb02@mail.gmail.com> <49FB55A3.605@entel.upc.edu> <3a142e750905011716g39ea55f0kd081bfdd55709b37@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> Any idea if is there anything to change/tune ? >> > > There is not just bbp17 to tune there are probably others much more important > registers. > > But as I already mentioned that code is completly missing. > > I was not talking about autotuning features, which are missing as you pointed. Was talking just about changing/tuning values of some registers to increase reception sensitivity. The people of linux, seem to have increased the sensitivity by modifing bbp17 and disabling autotuning. I tried with bbp17 and for the autotuning disabled, well, we already have it implemented :) (just joking) Anyway, giving that I didn't get an increase of sensitivity, I think we'll need the help of the developers. Well, this morning will try to increase sensitivity of those usb rum with a linux system, just to check what they say here : http://209.85.229.132/search?q=cache:H8W6R5Ds3mYJ:forum.aircrack-ng.org/index.php%3Ftopic%3D2235.0+bbp17+ralink+linux&cd=1&hl=ca&ct=clnk&gl=es&client=firefox-a Regards, Gus
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49FBF9B5.40800>