Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:45:48 +0200 From: Michael Gmelin <freebsdusb@bindone.de> To: "Paul B. Mahol" <onemda@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New patchset for acpi_wmi/acpi_hp Message-ID: <4A4A5D5C.3000400@bindone.de> In-Reply-To: <3a142e750906301122j792fb80qeb07783cbf8ea1c2@mail.gmail.com> References: <4A48DEB8.1040808@bindone.de> <83012DEA-D524-49CA-A8D2-6B03E69C4ED5@freebsd.org> <4A49E411.1060509@bindone.de> <3a142e750906301122j792fb80qeb07783cbf8ea1c2@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Paul B. Mahol wrote: > On 6/30/09, Michael Gmelin <freebsdusb@bindone.de> wrote: >> Rui Paulo wrote: >>> On 29 Jun 2009, at 16:33, Michael Gmelin wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> please find attached more patches against CURRENT of today. These >>>> patches include the patches I've sent on the 27th. > > Everything points they do not. > >>> Committed, thanks. >>> >>> -- >>> Rui Paulo >>> >> cool thanks, this should be pretty stable and clean enough so I don't >> expect any changes besides adding supported hardware to the man page in >> the near future (keeping my fingers crossed :) >> > > For some reason patches used for this commit do not have anywhere "verbose" > sysctl in code, and cat /dev/hpcmi doesnt work for me using code from CURRENT. > Better side of story is that acpica no longer complains about DTD. > > > Sorry, I really should noticed and reported this much before ... > Damnit, you're right. Don't know what actually happened. Sorry Rui, can you help me out? Thanks Michael
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A4A5D5C.3000400>