Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 11:24:46 -0700 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> To: george+freebsd@m5p.com Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A potential new porter seeking some clarifications Message-ID: <CAP7rwchjtk-AfXoVON5v4GHBSb=LBtBhAjT=ph4JEicEdGy1cA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3a90f64c-ce6e-2ca4-9399-e1173ccfd829@m5p.com> References: <5c126f7f.1c69fb81.88ea9.6a7a@mx.google.com> <454f6ab1-1ced-19d5-47e8-523b14e2575c@FreeBSD.org> <3a90f64c-ce6e-2ca4-9399-e1173ccfd829@m5p.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 11:00 AM George Mitchell <george+freebsd@m5p.com> wrote: > > On 12/13/18 10:06 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > [...] So long as you have sufficient disk space > > and you aren't trying to rebuild the entire ports tree, it can work well > > on a very ordinary desktop machine. [...] > > Still getting used to the idea that a machine with >16GB would today > be considered a "very ordinary desktop machine." -- Decrepit old George Do yourself a favour though and use ZFS. Poudriere is fast and elegant on ZFS. It is unavoidably painfully slow on UFS/FFS. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAP7rwchjtk-AfXoVON5v4GHBSb=LBtBhAjT=ph4JEicEdGy1cA>