Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 21:26:47 -0800 From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com> To: "Natham" <dak.col@gmail.com>, "Mel" <fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Cc: Lyle Miller <lm101ml@bellsouth.net>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Performance Issues on 6.3 Message-ID: <BMEDLGAENEKCJFGODFOCGEHECFAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> In-Reply-To: <3b93bd110803011003p7e5e34e9k9400400e2bfe7641@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Natham > Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2008 10:04 AM > To: Mel > Cc: Lyle Miller; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Performance Issues on 6.3 >=20 > I made the test today and i got awesome results. One of my harddrives > (RAID 1 ) goes offline. I made the test with only 1 disk trasfering a > 1.7GB file trought FTP and samba. Samba got about 24mb/s and ftp got > about 45mb/s from the single disk both. Samba takes the twice the time > than ftp, it is my bottleneck anyone has any patch/suggestion to = improve > the samba performance on freebsd? >=20 Are you happy with your 45mb/s? Wern't you claiming gigabit here? Seems if it was gigabit then 45mb/s is a problem, eh? One more test for you. Map a drive on your 'doze system Drop to command line (start->run->cmd) xcopy a sample file from c: to the mapped drive xcopy a sample file from mapped drive back to c: Time it Compare the times, what are the results? What are the results in comparison with the other tests? Ted
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BMEDLGAENEKCJFGODFOCGEHECFAA.tedm>