Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 11:37:11 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: BSD Freak <bsd-freak@mbox.com.au> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Does soft updates still require fsck? Message-ID: <20011112113710.A28444@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <3ed3633f0b80.3f0b803ed363@mbox.com.au>; from bsd-freak@mbox.com.au on Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 04:03:57PM %2B1100 References: <3ed3633f0b80.3f0b803ed363@mbox.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 04:03:57PM +1100, BSD Freak wrote: > Hi all.... >=20 > Tried finding some answers in the FreeBSD handbook and on the web but=20 > information seems to be sketchy.... >=20 > One of my FreeBSD boxes needs to come back up quickly in case of an=20 > unexpected power outage. On Linux I would use one of the available=20 > journaling file systems (ie XFS, JFS ReiserFS or Ext3).=20 >=20 > Does "soft updates" provide the facility to eliminate an 'fsck' after=20 > an "unclean" shutdown? Only under 5.0-CURRENT since it's still experimental. Kris --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE78CTmWry0BWjoQKURAoU1AJsEOrAWQYTtm+kFQXLH9/7R67kFIwCePStJ JclL3fGcvNR5ceHJHm4LnKg= =DXv6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011112113710.A28444>