Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 14:38:55 -0700 From: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org> To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Cc: hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3ware and RAID0 vs RAID 1 Message-ID: <200008102138.OAA01627@mass.osd.bsdi.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 10 Aug 2000 17:16:38 EDT." <4.3.2.7.0.20000810171454.04748db0@marble.sentex.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > >Newfs isn't a representative case with these cards, as newfs doesn't > >align the data it writes and the driver has to copy the data around > >(expensive). The array itself should still perform pretty well (read > >speeds should be pretty good especially). > > Actually, on a 128M system, it died while doing a 500M bonnie write.. i.e. > it just hung there. I will test some more tomorrow when back at the office > and provide more info. > > Aug 10 16:16:46 smtp4 /kernel: twed0: <3ware RAID unit> on twe0 > Aug 10 16:16:46 smtp4 /kernel: twed0: 14323MB (29334784 sectors) Ok, thanks. It *definitely* shouldn't "just hang" at all. -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200008102138.OAA01627>