Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 14:36:17 +0100 From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Inetd and wrapping. Message-ID: <19990618143617.A43897@bell.maths.tcd.ie> In-Reply-To: <40223.929712603@axl.noc.iafrica.com>; from Sheldon Hearn on Fri, Jun 18, 1999 at 03:30:03PM %2B0200 References: <9906181411.aa23134@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> <40223.929712603@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 18, 1999 at 03:30:03PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > Is the general consensus that we absolutely must have wrapper support > built into inetd? What we've got right now isn't doing a fantastic job, > and trying to wedge in the job tcpd did before is getting progressively > uglier. :-( I think we may almost be there, and we've unearther problems with inetd that were there anyway - but not as obvious without wrapping. While the process is painful I think the end result may be OK. David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990618143617.A43897>