Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 22:48:33 -0800 (PST) From: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Cc: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru> Subject: Re: mozilla and bind Message-ID: <20040326224549.T984@ync.qbhto.arg> In-Reply-To: <405D5C85.10706@fillmore-labs.com> References: <405B9799.5000008@ciam.ru> <20040319184525.E85086@qbhto.arg> <405BB3D7.5090905@fillmore-labs.com> <405D0268.4070901@FreeBSD.org> <405D5C85.10706@fillmore-labs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Oliver Eikemeier wrote:
> Currently the problem the problem only shifted from people installing the
> port with PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND8 to PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND8_INCLUDES,
> which will be admittedly less users.
It's not only less users, it's a group of users who specifically
requested that I replace the includes so that they could link against
the port's version of libbind.
I really think this is a non-issue, but if we get complaints about it,
I'll be happy to revisit this.
Thanks,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040326224549.T984>