Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 15:24:46 +0200 (CEST) From: "Julien Gabel" <jpeg@thilelli.net> To: "Marian Hettwer" <Mh@kernel32.de> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xfce4-iconbox doesn't start Message-ID: <49861.192.168.0.105.1082467486.squirrel@webmail.thilelli.net> In-Reply-To: <408510EE.6010403@kernel32.de> References: <4083DE92.9020506@kernel32.de> <49555.192.168.0.105.1082385176.squirrel@webmail.thilelli.net> <4083E4EF.6090601@kernel32.de> <4084E16A.6090209@kernel32.de> <49314.192.168.0.105.1082460169.squirrel@webmail.thilelli.net> <408510EE.6010403@kernel32.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> [mhettwer@acchilles] <~> $ pkg_info -xr xfce4-iconbox|grep -i gtk > Dependency: gtk-2.2.4_1 > Dependency: gtk-2.4.0 If there no other applications which are using 'gtk-2.2.4' try remove it. If some depends on it, try to upgrade them (if possible with their dependancies using portupgrade -rR xxx). With a little luck, 'gtk-2.2.4' will not be needed anymore. > Obviously it's linked against both libs > [mhettwer@acchilles] <~> $ ldd /usr/X11R6/bin/xfce4-iconbox |grep -i > libgtk > libgtk-x11-2.0.so.400 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.400 > (0x280ce000) > libgtk-x11-2.0.so.200 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.200 > (0x2888f000) > > This makes no sense... eh ? Cause of the 2 versions of the same port. > Well, I do have a ktrace.out now, and I tried to take a look by using > kdump. The last pages of this file shows that he's searching for > libXcursor.so.1.0 and he's not finding it ... > [...] > I did a find /usr/X11R6/ -name libXcursor* and I found some: > > /usr/X11R6/lib/libXcursor.so.1 > /usr/X11R6/lib/libXcursor.so > /usr/X11R6/lib/libXcursor.a > > Hm... he's looking for libXcursor.so.1.0 according to the dump. > The file libXcursor.so.1 is just a symlink onto libXcursor.so The library 'libXcursor' is provided by XFree86-libraries-4.3.0. I your package up to date? What is the output of 'ldd /usr/X11R6/bin/xfce4-iconbox'? All the libraries must be resolved. A least you must have a problem with libXcursor since the binary is linked with libXcursor.so.1.0, but not present on your installation. > Damn, still core dumping. Although this time not while searching > libXcursor.so.1.0 Generally speaking, are your packages up to date? Or not too old regarding the version available in the ports tree? It seems we are searching against some dependancies problems on versions... not directly a problem whith xfce4-iconbox. -- -jpeg.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49861.192.168.0.105.1082467486.squirrel>