Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 09:42:40 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky <oceanare@pacific.net.sg> To: Eitarou Kamo <e-kamo@trio.plala.or.jp> Cc: Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk> Subject: Re: SMP of 4.10 Message-ID: <40B69910.1080601@pacific.net.sg> In-Reply-To: <40B610A8.1030203@trio.plala.or.jp> References: <40B5FC44.4060107@trio.plala.or.jp><200405271117.00553.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <40B609D4.5030108@trio.plala.or.jp> <0b9401c44400$f8dbf530$7b07000a@int.mediasurface.com> <40B610A8.1030203@trio.plala.or.jp>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Eitarou Kamo wrote: > Hi, > > Steven Hartland wrote: > > >>We use 5.2.1 SMP on all our new production level servers >>and have not had any problems. Infact it runs better and >>is the only version that runs on some of the newer hardware. >> >> Steve >> >> > > Sounds good! BTW, is 5.2.1 SMP faster than 4.X one? > 5.2 has two options for the scheduler. Sometimes it is faster, sometimes it is slower. There have been several threads in this list dealing with it. I use 5.2 without any problems. Erich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40B69910.1080601>