Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 01:04:57 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky <oceanare@pacific.net.sg> To: Aniruddha Bohra <bohra@cs.rutgers.edu> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suggestions ? Message-ID: <40BE08B9.8070807@pacific.net.sg> In-Reply-To: <40BE0747.2050405@cs.rutgers.edu> References: <40BDF377.4000900@jaist.ac.jp> <40BE05C0.1090807@pacific.net.sg> <40BE0747.2050405@cs.rutgers.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, Aniruddha Bohra wrote: >>> i was thinking about implementing Robust TCP/IP connections .. but >>> somebody told me that is not very consistent , and i think so also , >>> >> Did you consider fault-tolerant TCP/IP connections to multiple servers? > > > See these : > This one is heavy-weight, whole process wrapping etc. > Also the implementation is on Linux. > Engineering fault-tolerant TCP/IP servers using FT-TCP. > D. Zagorodnov, K. Marzullo, L. Alvisi, and T.C. Bressoud. > In Proc. IEEE Intl. Conf. on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN), > > http://www.cs.ucsd.edu/~dzagorod/research/pubs/zagorodnov_et_al-fttcp-dsn03.pdf > > > > This one is lightweight(in place logging), > works for TCP/IP and for pipes and the implementation is on > FreeBSD. > Service Continuations: An Operating System Mechanism for Dynamic > Migration of Internet Service Sessions. > F. Sultan, A. Bohra, L. Iftode. > The 22nd Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS), October 2003. > > http://discolab.rutgers.edu/sc/srds03.ps > I did not know of them. Thanks! Erich > Cheers > Aniruddha > >> >> This would make it very easy to implement fault-tolerant systems with >> FreeBSD if the communication is TCP/IP based. >> >> Erich >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40BE08B9.8070807>