Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 12:44:04 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> To: David Fuchs <david@davidfuchs.ca> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: arplookup WWW.XXX.YYY.ZZZ failed: host is not on local network Message-ID: <40D078D4.5020904@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <40CFC386.3000005@davidfuchs.ca> References: <40CFC386.3000005@davidfuchs.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Fuchs wrote: > Ok, riddle me this: > > /kernel: arplookup WWW.XXX.YYY.10 failed: host is not on local network > [ ... ] Static routes have been added to > force all communication *between* these two hosts to use the secondary > interfaces: > > WWW.XXX.YYY.25's static route: > route add WWW.XXX.YYY.10 172.16.1.10 > > WWW.XXX.YYY.10's static route: > route add WWW.XXX.YYY.25 172.16.1.25 You've identified the cause of the problem yourself. One solution would be to stop trying to route IPs which are on a directly connected subnet via your secondary interface. If you want the machines to talk to each other using your 172 network, have whatever services connect to or listen on those IPs rather than on your WWW.XXX.YYY network addresses. -- -Chuck
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40D078D4.5020904>