Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 22:32:54 -0500 From: Jon Noack <noackjr@alumni.rice.edu> To: Sergio Carrillo <scarrillo@arsystel.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X.Org Message-ID: <40DCEE66.5070401@alumni.rice.edu> In-Reply-To: <40DCED51.4070003@arsystel.com> References: <200406251853.45449.akbeech@northwindcom.dyndns.org> <20040626031020.GA1839@xor.obsecurity.org> <40DCED51.4070003@arsystel.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06/25/04 22:28, Sergio Carrillo wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 06:53:45PM -0800, Beecher Rintoul wrote: >>> I have been using XFree86 for some time now, and it's time to do some >>> upgrades. I have heard that the new X.Org might be a better choice. >>> Does anyone have an opinion on it? With the time involved to compile >>> on a 400 MHz box, I thought I would ask before I just dove in. >> >> The x.org packages don't yet build on the cluster. >> > I'm running it, the only problem is to deal with dependencies in some > ports (pkdb -F). I needed it to support radeon9600, but don't want to > install the Xfree-snap server: For what it's worth, I used the xfree86-snap server with no problems for several months on an ATI Radeon 9800 Pro. Jon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40DCEE66.5070401>